AI consulting & implementation
Your AI partner fora better-run business
Most businesses do not need an AI strategy. They need one specific thing to stop eating their week. I find that thing, build it with the tools you already have, and hand it over.
See how it worksThe problem
The problem is rarely a lack of software.
You already pay for a CRM, a mailbox, a project tool, and probably three things nobody logs into. The cost is in the gaps between them: the follow-up that came two days late, the report rebuilt by hand every Monday, the answer that lives only in one person's head.
AI is good at exactly those gaps — and unremarkable at most of what it gets sold for. My job is to be honest about which is which, and to leave you with something your team uses next quarter, not a pilot nobody opens.
What I do
Three places the work gets stuck
Sales
Leads go cold before anyone follows up
Enquiries sit in an inbox, follow-up depends on whoever remembers, and nobody can say what happened to last month's leads.
- Follow-up happens late, or not at all
- Quotes and proposals take days to write
- No clear view of which deals are actually moving
Marketing
Content and campaigns stall between ideas and publishing
You know what you want to say. Turning it into consistent, on-brand output every week is where it breaks down.
Operations
The team spends its week on work software should handle
Copying data between tools, chasing status updates, rebuilding the same document. It is quiet, expensive, and easy to miss.
Sequenced, not simultaneous
One workflow is built, tested, and handed to your team before the next one starts.
Built on the tools you already run
Browse every integration →
A concrete example
What "one AI win" actually looks like
Here is a typical first build: turning scattered enquiries into same-day, on-brand follow-up — with a human approving before anything goes out.
- 01
Enquiry arrives
Form, email, or phone
- 02
Captured once
Logged with source and owner
- 03
Draft prepared
AI drafts the reply from past work
- 04
You approve
Human check before anything sends
- 05
Sent & tracked
Follow-up scheduled automatically
The approval step stays human on purpose. Nothing leaves your business without someone signing off on it.
How it works
Diagnose. Build. Hand it over.
- 01
Diagnose
Week 1
We find where time and revenue are actually leaking, and which of those problems AI is genuinely suited to.
- 02
Pick one win
Week 2
We agree on a single first problem worth solving — narrow enough to finish, valuable enough to notice.
- 03
Build
Weeks 3-6
I build the workflow using AI tools and your existing systems, and test it against real cases from your business.
- 04
Hand over
Weeks 7-8
Your team learns to run it without me in the room, with written instructions they can actually follow.
- 05
Improve
Ongoing
We review what it produced, fix what drifted, and decide together whether to tackle the next bottleneck.
Pricing
Monthly engagements, scoped before they start
Focus
$3,000
per month
One bottleneck at a time, worked on properly.
1 active workflow
2 × 45-minute sessions each month
- 1 team training and operating guide
- Monthly monitoring and review
Partner
$6,000
per month
An ongoing partner across sales, marketing, and operations.
1 active build + managed live workflows
1 × 60-minute session each week
- Up to 2 training sessions per workflow
- Managed live workflows and monthly reporting
Custom
from $9,000
per month
Larger scope, multiple teams, or a defined transformation programme.
Multiple teams; capacity agreed in scope
Custom operating and review cadence
- Role-based training and governance
- Multi-workflow monitoring as scoped
Questions
Reasonable things to ask first
Who actually does the work?+
Carlos does. This is a solo practice — the person you meet in the first conversation is the person building the workflows and sitting in the reviews. AI tooling is what makes that scope possible.
How long before we see anything useful?+
The first diagnosis is written up in the opening weeks, and the first workflow is typically in your hands within the first engagement period. Complex work takes longer; you will know which kind yours is before anything is built.
Do we need to replace our existing tools?+
Usually not. Most of the value comes from connecting what you already pay for and removing the manual steps between them.
What if our team resists this?+
That is normal and worth taking seriously. Work is built with the people who do the job, handed over with live training, and documented in plain language. If a workflow only works when I am in the room, it is not finished.
Will this replace our staff?+
The goal is to give time back to the people you already employ, not to reduce the team. What happens with that time is your decision.
What happens to our data?+
Access is limited to what a specific piece of work needs, and agreed with you first. Data handling is covered in the engagement agreement before anything is connected.
Can we stop?+
After the initial 90-day engagement it runs month to month. Documentation is yours to keep either way.
Tell me what's slowing the business down.
A short form, no calendar. I'll read it and reply with an honest view of whether this is worth doing — and what it would take.